Dear Sir,Sadly there's a crop of letters in today's Guardian all (most anyway) making the same bogus argument that they wouldn't know what the zionists were saying if the advert hadn't been published. That's absurd, the reason there were so many complaints before the ad was run was because the ad had been shown elsewhere so its content was known and The Guardian had already reported on it. Of course, if they want to know broadly what Zionists are saying all they have to do is read Jonathan Freedland.
As a signatory of Jews for Justice for Palestinians, I am so outraged by your decision to publish the infamous Eli Wiesel/Shmuely Boteach ad that I have decided to make a protest by cancelling my subscription to the Guardian. I do this with great regret, as I have been a long-standing Guardian reader and subscriber. I switched many years ago from reading the Times to reading what seemed to me to be the much more interesting and informative pages of the Guardian. But even the Times refused to publish this ad.Freedom of speech does have some limits in a newspaper with civilised standards. The ad includes the sentence: "It is a battle of civilisation versus barbarism". This ad is barbaric. After 1,400 Palestinian civilians, including over 400 children, have been massacred in an utterly unnecessary and avoidable onslaught, in what is a war crime and a crime against humanity, it is an outrage to publish an ad that effectively exculpates from responsibility the Israel soldiers who did the killing. Even the Murdoch press could not stomach this ad, so why did the Guardian publish it?
Acts of violence
3 hours ago