I wouldn't have noticed this but for The Community Security Trust's Dave Rich agreeing with what looked like an allegation from Linda Grant that Jeremy Corbyn is himself antisemitic.
A quick scan of Dave Rich's Twitter account yielded this little gem:@lindasgrant if Milne was a mensch he would have replied "no, I've known him for years he's a decent guy we just disagree." But he didn't.— Dave Rich (@daverich1) June 1, 2016
A "little bit of a conspiracy going on" now has the official stamp of disapproval from the provisional wing of the Zionist movement in the UK.“There is a little bit of a conspiracy going on”. Jackie Walker certainly knows her antisemitic tropes, doesn't she? https://t.co/DPcQW1FStG— Dave Rich (@daverich1) June 2, 2016
So what was Jackie Walker thinking of when she invoked this "antisemitic trope"? Let's have a look at The Jewish Chronicle. I mean, I hesitate to allege a conspiracy but whenever lots of people in lots of media are saying the same wrong thing about someone falsely accused of antisemitism, the JC is usually in there somewhere. And their headline:
Jacqueline Walker claims her suspension from Labour was part of a conspiracy
Now immediately we ought to smell a rat because Dave Rich put his quote in quotes. That is, it was an exact quote. Where he messed up is he made out "a little bit of a conspiracy" is an "antisemitic trope". The antisemitic trope about conspiracies is usual the worldwide Jewish conspiracy theory. That's the idea that all of the world's Jews are party to the same conspiracy to the benefit of all Jews and to the detriment of everyone else. Not so much a little bit of a conspiracy but a literally impossibly huge conspiracy.
Now the JC was a bit smarter than Dave Rich (who isn't?). They've made out that Jackie Walker could have been suggesting that the smear campaign against Corbynistas and Palestine solidarity supporters is part of a much bigger conspiracy. That seems to be what they are attempting with their headline. But they didn't just run with a headline. They ran the story and like Dave Rich they seem to have run real quotes that contradict the headline:
Ms Walker, who was readmitted to the party after being suspended over allegations of making antisemitic comments, said: “There is a little bit of a conspiracy going on”.
Speaking at a meeting in Brighton last night, she told a 50-strong audience that she had been abroad when she was informed of her suspension last month.
She said: “Look at the date of the Jewish Chronicle when that came out. I was actually in Turkey.“My letter suspending me was actually dated 4 May. The Jewish Chronicle published the story about me on 4 May.
“Now, you have to put two and two together. What you will know is that somebody in the [Labour] compliance unit, or around there, is leaking information out to the media.
Conspiracy? Well ok, but just a small one, like Jackie Walker said.
Now let's have a look at the case of Tony Greenstein and his suspension from the Labour Party. Tony was told that he was being suspended because of certain things that he had said but he wasn't told what those things were. Curiously, The Times and The Telegraph were told what those things were and they said that Tony had said that the Jews had supported the Nazis' antisemitic Nuremberg Laws. Tony of course had said nothing of the kind and for fear of libel action by Tony (who knows his legal stuff) both The Times and The Telegraph ran retractions.
So the false allegations against Tony Greenstein were leaked to and published by The Times and The Telegraph and before the allegations were put to Tony. Whoever the leaker was must have known that the details were going to be published. Conspiracy? Ok, make it a double! Cheers, or L'chaim as we rootless cosmopolitans like to say.
So whilst Zionists can make an "antisemitic trope" out of just about anything, the suggestion that the smear campaign against various Israel critics looks like it is indeed a bit of a conspiracy. I know size isn't important but "little bit" appears to be a little bit of an understatement.